Sorry about my absence, I’ve been following “John Hamm’s 10 Steps to be More Like
Don Draper”.
But hey, I’m back aren’t I?
Anyways, I’ve been thinking a lot about this BCS system, and I figure there isn’t a better day to bring it up than January 1
st.
I’m starting to more and more agree with
Carl from “Aqua Teen Hunger Force”.
The BCS is obviously far from perfect,

but it’s the most modern version of the college insanity that has been going on for years; and sadly, it is probably the best option that has been explored and used by the NCAA.
But, it still sucks.
I wanted to come up with some clever word-smith-er-y there but I felt the straightforward simplicity of
“It sucks” speaks to the point.
The other option commonly presented is a March Madness esque, 12-16 team playoff.
Which personally, I feel is a bit much.
So the most commonly presented options we hear as sports fans are, leave it be, it’s awful but it could get worse, and lets throw a bunch of teams into a pile and see who comes out.
I don’t know about you but I played Football a few years in high school, and those seasons took a toll on me at 10 games.
These athletes are already playing 13-15 games a season depending on conference championships and bowls.
And the solution is to extend that by 1-4 games?
Like expanding the NFL schedule, this is a bad idea.
Interestingly enough, my solution to both options is well… both options.
And that means BCS and playoffs.
Yup,
playoffs.
But Kenton, you can’t have your cake and eat it too. Yes, yes I can. It’s fairly simple and would solve the usual questions that arise during the BCS selections and bowls: Should Boise/TCU play in the National Championship? Who invited anyone from the Big East? Why is Ohio State in the National Championship? Who’s overrated? Who’s underrated? Etc.

BCS Playoff plans:
· BCS is the deciding factor in Bowl Rankings
· No more AQ’s because if a team wins the Big Ten, or Twelve, Pac 10 or SEC, more likely than not, they’ll be top 8
· These top 8 teams go to the BCS bowl games like before, (Rose, Sugar, Fiesta, Orange)
· All other Bowl eligible teams get their non – BCS bowls
· The BCS Bowls are the playoff games.
· The top 8 teams are seeded by traditional placing. Meaning if there is a Big Ten and a Pac 10 team present, they will face each other in The Rose Bowl etc
· Every year the first round includes all 4 bowls, but the second and championship rounds rotate. So if the initial year has The Fiesta Bowl as the Championship game, it is not in the second round of playoffs that year, and will not be in the second or championship round the following year
· This means it is possible to be Rose/Fiesta/Sugar/Orange Bowl Champs and National Champs
If a team of a non-automatic qualifying conference like Boise State or TCU can pull off an upset in a BCS game, it remains just that, an upset. But, if a team from a non AQ wins 3 BCS playoff games to win a National Championship, there will be no question, I don't care if it's
Ball State somehow. Any top 8 team that outlasts the other 7; regardless of conference or preseason poll, can not be doubted by any one of sane mind that they deserve
The Coaches' Trophy. This plan maintains as much tradition as possible while modernizing the game.
No longer can the point be brought forward that an undefeated Non AQ would have won the big game if they had the chance.
Because under this system, they would have their chance.
